The State Dept. Has to Speak Out About This NOW: Israel Taking Unilateral Action to Prevent Contiguous Palestinian State


We hear a lot in the media, from our government and from commentators about how the Palestinians are undermining the peace process by taking “unilateral” action by going to the United Nations in an attempt to have a Palestinian state recognized by the international body. Both Secretary Clinton and President Obama have repeatedly denounced the Palestinians for taking “symbolic” action that seeks to “delegitimize” the state of Israel. Putting aside the stupidity of such an argument, I was wondering when the Obama administration was going to speak out about the growing number of Israeli land grabs currently taking place beyond the Green Line? I was wondering when the U.S. media was going to take note? Is illegal land confiscation not “unilateral” action? It certainly is more than symbolic. In fact, the ongoing illegal settlement expansion does tremendous harm by changing the facts on the ground in a way that disproportionately disadvantages the Palestinians. Is this not a form of “delegitimization” of the Palestinians?

This is why the administration argument against the Palestinians’ bid for UN recognition falls apart at the seams- it’s the usual biased moderating from the so-called “Honest Broker.”

Today in Haaretz, there is this:

The IDF Civil Administration is taking steps to increase state-ownership of West Bank lands, an internal military document reveals. The policy enables increased construction not only around settlement blocs like Ariel, Ma’aleh Adumim and Gush Etzion, but also in strategic areas like the Jordan Valley and Dead Sea.

Until now it was not known that the administration, which is a military agency, was charged with distinguishing between the blocs Israel is demanding to annex as part of a final-status agreement and the rest of the settlements.

[snip]

The inclusion of the Jordan Valley, northern Dead Sea and area surrounding Ariel in the “settlement blocs” whose takeover the administration is advancing, would prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state with territorial contiguity. In addition, the scope of land in question thwarts the possibility of exchanging areas in a peace settlement, according to the formula presented by U.S. President Barack Obama on May 19.

This is because on the western side of the Green Line there is not enough open land to compensate the Palestinians for such an extensive annexation, according to examinations carried out during previous talks between Israel and the Palestinians.

It has recently been reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wants Obama to ratify the letter of his predecessor George Bush, of April 2004, saying the United States is in favor of the new borders, which take into account “the new reality on the ground,” including the existence of “major Israeli population centers.”

Yes, our ally.

This is why I posted an article yesterday discussing how the Obama administration is trying to ease the anxiety of Jewish Democrats by pandering seemingly taking a hands off approach to Mideast peace so as to not be seen as putting any pressure on Bibi Netanyahu. One of the issues that pops up in all of these polls of the Jewish community is that they seem to think the POTUS is unfairly harsh to Israel- only making demands of Israel while letting the Palestinians do anything they want. Hello? Where have these people been? This article from Haaretz excerpted above is the perfect example of how the U.S. continues to allow Israel to take unilateral steps to change the facts on the ground so as to prevent a Palestinian state with contiguous borders.

If the media aren’t going to report on this and if the State Dept. and White House are content to let Israel continue to thwart a two state solution and if the Jewish community and Israel Lobby are insistent that the U.S. put zero pressure on Israel, then it’s time for all those aforementioned groups to come out publicly and dispense with the fiction that we are in search of a viable two state solution. Because we are not. And if that’s the case then we are headed towards a one-state solution based on an Apartheid system. If that’s what people want then they should have the guts to come out and say it. And I don’t want to hear any of this nonsense about how using the word “apartheid” is anti-Semitism. It’s time to have an honest debate without all the rhetorical efforts to censor people.

On a related topic, the House Foreign Affairs Committee is successfully trying to prevent the President from continuing to thwart the transfer of the U.S. embassy in Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, on national security grounds- something which Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama have been doing in order to prevent all hell from breaking loose in Israel-Palestine. The committee added an update to the legislation (The Jerusalem Embassy Act) this week which specifically states that Jerusalem is to remain the “undivided capitol” of Israel and as such, the U.S. Embassy should be in Jerusalem, and that the POTUS, starting in 2014, can no longer prevent the transfer. In other words, no two state solution.

I’m going to call my members of Congress and the White House and try to make the point that Congress is sabotaging the President’s foreign policy, destroying any chance of a two state solution and trying to foment antagonism in the region with this new Embassy Act they are likely going to pass. I also intend on writing to NYT, WaPo, etc. to ask why they continue with a total blackout of Israel’s unhelpful and provocative actions in the Occupied Territories. It probably won’t accomplish anything, but at least I’ll be able to let them know that some people are paying attention.

Advertisements
, , , , , , , , , , ,

About Stacy

Attorney, Publisher, Foreign Policy wonk

View all posts by Stacy

Subscribe

Subscribe to our RSS feed and social profiles to receive updates.

5 Comments on “The State Dept. Has to Speak Out About This NOW: Israel Taking Unilateral Action to Prevent Contiguous Palestinian State”

  1. Carolyn-Rodham Says:

    Great post stacy. It’s a complete outrage, not that anything Israel does shocks me anymore. I’m going to write my Congressional reps, too — although I have lost all faith that the people elected to represent us actually have the country’s best interests at heart anymore.

    Reply

  2. Pilgrim Says:

    I do believe that Israel is setting up an apartheid regime.

    What I cannot understand is: when the Jewish people were treated with such unspeakable cruelty in the thirties-forties, why they can not turn around and be so mean to the Palestinians.

    And here’s another thing: the Palestinians were there first, even in biblical times they were there first.

    Reply

    • Pilgrim Says:

      excuse me, typographical error…

      When they were treated with such cruelty, why they can NOW turn around and be so mean to the Palestinians

      Reply

  3. thainjacobs Says:

    The State Dept. and WH don’t give a damn. They are the ones feeding into it. We haven’t heard a statement condemning this and we won’t, because they are too busy kissing AIPAC’s ass. Honestly, when has Hillary ever shown the slightest bit of empathy for the Palestinian point of view other than to repeat the same line about “realizing their God-given potential” with absolutely no emotion or feeling whatsoever. You read the Palestine Papers- she MOCKED the Palestinian leaders to their face! Contrast that with how defensive she gets about Israel and you know why you shouldn’t hold your breath waiting for the State Dept. fax machine to start spitting out statements of condemnation of what’s described in that Haaretz article.

    There’s no way to get the truth out. The NYT, CNN, WaPo etc. won’t touch this stuff or if they do, they leave out key information. Then you have little zionbot campaigns like this (older article but you get the gist):

    http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/23/readers-discuss-wikipedia-editing-course-that-aims-for-balanced-and-zionist-entries/

    Notice the last part of that article about how quickly the State Dept. responded to that Israeli Jewish woman’s complaint. Do you think the State Dept. will respond that quickly to me today if me and my friends give them a call and tell them they better damn well condemn these land grabs!?! HA! Funny!

    I’ll contact my members of Congress too but given who they are, I’m sure they will just write me off as an anti-Israel bigot because that makes them feel BETTER about themselves because then they don’t have to take any responsibility for what’s happening as a result of THEIR policies.

    Reply

  4. thainjacobs Says:

    Well it looks like the State Dept. never said a single thing about this. WTF? Oh, that’s right. 2012. I wrote my reps and called on Friday- when I called the aides of Rep. Jim Himes were really dismissive and had an attitude. Friggin’ annoying. I even told them they better not write me off as anti-Israel and that if there was going to be two states these settlements had to stop. The guy on the phone had the nerve to tell me that the problem was that the Palestinians won’t negotiate and they formed a unity govt with Hamas. Do you believe that? He fucking argued with me? I told him (the aide) that the unity deal hadn’t come to fruition and that there could be no lasting solution without Hamas- the PA doesn’t speak for all Palestinians. Then I asked him how there was going to be two states when Israel is continuing to build in East Jerusalem and making the possibility of a contiguous palestinian state impossible. Silence on the other end. Asshat.

    Reply

Leave a Response

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: