*updated* Neocons & Islamophobic Right Not So Interested in Oslo Bombing Now That It’s Clear It Was Not Perpetrated by Islamofascists

Anders Behring Breivik

Honestly, you can’t make this stuff up. I have been crazy busy at work and at home and was barely able to watch/listen to/read that much about the tragic terror attack in Oslo. But one of the things I did initially hear is that it must be the result of a Jihadi movement. Now that I have time to sit down and actually look through the coverage, it appears that the Right Wing media and blogosphere went nuts covering the story, that was until they found out it was a far-right Christian with anti-Muslim views, Anders Behring Breivik, that had perpetrated the deadly attack. In other words, he has the same political philosophy of fear, hate, Islamophobia and xenophobia that they do.

Think Progress has compiled all the great quotes from the neocons blaming Islamic terrorists for the attack- Jen Rubin, Cliff May, Thomas Josceyln etc. It’s worth a read but the most obnoxious by far is, as usual, the post by Jen Rubin at the WaPo:

…A massive explosion rocked a government district in Norway’s capital Friday, killing seven people and injuring many more, and a shooter at a political convention on an island north of Oslo appeared to have inflicted more casualties, in incidents police are treating as connected, a police spokesman said.

Thomas Joscelyn explains at the Weekly Standard Web site:

Just one year ago, authorities in Oslo broke up an al Qaeda-directed bomb plot that originated in northern Pakistan. Good intelligence, including intercepted emails between an al Qaeda planner and the Oslo cell, prevented the plotters from assembling and launching their bomb. . . .

Oslo was not as fortunate today. . . .

We don’t know if al Qaeda was directly responsible for today’s events, but in all likelihood the attack was launched by part of the jihadist hydra. Prominent jihadists have already claimed online that the attack is payback for Norway’s involvement in the war in Afghanistan.

Moreover, there is a specific jihadist connection here: “Just nine days ago, Norwegian authorities filed charges against Mullah Krekar, an infamous al Qaeda-affiliated terrorist who, with help from Osama bin Laden, founded Ansar al Islam – a branch of al Qaeda in northern Iraq – in late 2001.”

This is a sobering reminder for those who think it’s too expensive to wage a war against jihadists.

While it’s true that there was an initial report that some extremist group had claimed responsibility, that was very quickly retracted by the Norwegian police. If this were just some random righty blogger, it wouldn’t be such a big deal, but it’s the Washington Post, and at the very least, you would think Rubin would update the blog to alert her readers to the error. But no, she hasn’t done that.

Now that a White guy is in custody, the wall to wall coverage of the attack has stopped and miraculously, all the neocons have gone silent! Gee, I wonder why? In fact, as I peruse the righty blogs and some of the neocons on Twitter, they don’t even seem to consider this terrorism now but rather just the work of a troubled lone wolf. In fact, Pamela Geller of the hate site Atlas Shrugs is busy thinking up a new conspiracy because she just can’t stand the thought of having to blame a White guy. So she’s busy writing about how “The Left” has managed to convince the world that Anders Behring Breivik is a right-wing Christian when in fact, he’s not.

I’ve written many times on this blog and on other blogs how this nation is becoming consumed by fear and obsessed with scapegoating. It’s become mainstream to talk about Muslims and Islam in the same way we used to talk about Jews and African Americans back in the 20’s, 30’s and 40’s.

UPDATE: After going back and re-reading Jen Rubin’s blog post over at the WaPo and noticing that it has now been over 24 hrs since it went up and she has yet to update it, correct it or issue a retraction, I just wrote the ombudsman. Interestingly, she DID have time to write 2 new posts about the debt crisis.

Here’s my letter to the ombudsman:

To whom it may concern-

I am writing about Jen Rubin’s blog post from Friday 7/22/2011 where she made ridiculous, stereotypical assertions about the identity of the person or persons responsible for the bombing/terrorist attack in Norway. This would not be such an issue were it not for the fact that a) Rubin has a history of playing fast and loose with facts b) she never corrects or updates her posts when she has been proven to be wrong and c) her post about Islamic Jihadists being responsible for the bombing is in line with her Islamophobic, fear-mongering in general.

I certainly think that having both conservative and liberal bloggers is not a problem for journalist/media like the WaPo or NYT but when those bloggers are held to no standards, that IS a problem. It doesn’t matter that they are expressing opinions or what their particular ideology is, to not demand a level of respectability and honesty ruins the whole Washington Post brand. Jen Rubin’s brand of commentary is particularly insidious because it so often depends on sweeping stereotypes about groups of people and at times borders on racist and xenophobic. Would it be fair to assume that because the usual targets of Rubin’s vitriol are Muslim, the Washington Post feels it is not necessary to set the record straight when factual errors are made? If her targets were instead Jewish, Catholic or African Americans, wouldn’t it be a given that her constant stereotyping and scapegoating would not be tolerated?

It might be tempting to defend Rubin by saying that at the time she put up her post about the attack, not all of the facts were available. However, that is all the more reason why Rubin should not have jumped to conclusions based almost entirely on her own political worldview. In addition, the NYT had writers that also didn’t have all the facts, but they were able to write about the attack without assigning blame to a particular group of people.

It has now been 24 hours since Rubin posted her factually-incorrect, politically expedient post on the Norway bombing and while she has found the time to post two or three new stories today, she has NOT found the time to update the Norway post and offer a correction, nor has she found the time to write a new post about the bombing that discusses the actual facts of the case. This is simply unacceptable.

, , , , , , , , ,

About Stacy

Attorney, Publisher, Foreign Policy wonk

View all posts by Stacy


Subscribe to our RSS feed and social profiles to receive updates.

7 Comments on “*updated* Neocons & Islamophobic Right Not So Interested in Oslo Bombing Now That It’s Clear It Was Not Perpetrated by Islamofascists”

  1. Pilgrim Says:

    Good for you !!


  2. discourseincsharpminor Says:

    As soon as they took a look at this guy, it was no longer a terrorist act. I’ve actually seen comments that say “Well, at first I was convinced it was terrorism.” What about this incident, other than the fact that the suspect in custody is a conservative, Christian, nationalist named Anders, makes bombing a government building and shooting up a camp full of kids something other than an act of terrorism?


  3. Stacy Says:

    Discourse- it’s infuriating.

    On Twitter and on the blogs the righties are running around saying it was a “lone wolf” and I respond “but what if he had been Muslim or what about Fort Hood”- remember the controversy about calling that Fort Hood shooter, Nidal Hassan, a terrorist. The righties were insistent he was even though he wasn’t part of an organized extremist group but rather became a follower from afar. The question should be, did they do what they did to terrorize people- people other than just those who died? I think the answer here is yes. It can be tricky at times defining terrorism because it’s so political. If someone walks into a shopping mall and starts shooting, is that terrorism? I guess it depends on why they did it, was there an ideology involved etc. Oklahoma, Fort Hood, Norway all seem to be based upon a particular extremist ideology and they wanted to send a larger message. The case of Jarred Loughner is much more difficult because he seems psychotic and it’s not totally clear what his motive was.

    Go read the comment section to Jen Rubin’s offensive blog post. One of the commenters noted that after the Loughner killings Rubin said this:

    “The impulse to blame political opponents for tragedy and to convert human misery into a political weapon — both of which were played out on Twitter and the Internet by liberals as diverse as Paul Krugman, Jane Fonda, and the Daily Kos crowd — is deeply regrettable. But it has unfortunately become par for the course.”


    • thainjacobs Says:

      Jen Rubin is proof that the WaPo has become nothing but a neocon rag.

      The ugly truth is that Brevik was inspired by people like Rubin- she wants to change the focus from the role of his ideology because while she may not be violent, her rhetoric is racist and Islamophobic. Rubin also likely doesn’t want to point out how these right wing extremists have rallied around Israel’s racist policies, much like she has. The righties want to downplay the growing threat of right wing extremism in Europe and focus instead on Muslims, whom they hate. So long as they hide their racism behind claims of “security” or pro-Israel sentiment, no one questions it. Of course, were Jews still the target of said extremists, they’d be screaming bloody murder. The hypocrisy is incredible.

      Naturally the media won’t point out the role of Islamophobia and right wing Zionism in all of this. Probably because most of them are adherents to Zionism, whether or not they are Jewish (one doesn’t have to be Jewish to be a Zionist).

      Zionism=Racism. Tell your friends 😉


  4. Pilgrim Says:

    I see Steve Clemons has addressed a sharply-worded rebuke to Rubin. He says James Fallows is demanding an apology from her and the Post. Good.



  1. It’s Only Terrorism If The Perpetrator Is Muslim *updated* | US FoPo & the Middle East - July 25, 2011

    […] I wrote about how the media’s response to the attack in Norway changed dramatically after it was revealed […]

  2. Washington Post Ombudsman Defends Jennifer Rubin’s Post About the Norway Attack | US FoPo & the Middle East - August 1, 2011

    […] won’t bore you with a total re-hashing of the controversy, which I wrote about at length when it happened. I was one of the thousands of people who wrote to the WaPo ombudsman because Rubin’s […]

Leave a Response

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: