Washington Post: Support for Palestinians at UN is Anti-Semitism *updated*


The Washington Post is certainly working overtime to get Israel’s message out. Between Jackson Diehl, Richard Cohen, Jennifer Rubin and Fred Hiatt, it’s hard to tell who is a more effective hasbarist.

In a guest commentary over at the WaPo, Robert Bernstein makes an argument that ends up minimizing true anti-Semitism as it tries to conflate opposition to Israeli policies with hatred of all Jews:

Yet at this moment of possibility, the United Nations is fueling discord and anti-Semitism.

The United Nations is doing this by granting legitimacy to Hamas, a terrorist Islamic group, and the Palestinian Authority headed by Mahmoud Abbas. A vote to add to the United Nations a new member state that calls for the elimination of its neighbor and glorifies terrorism will make peace harder — not easier — to achieve. While Hamas’s calls for genocide most certainly should be condemned, those who would accept the position Abbas has taken, even as recently as Friday, when he submitted to the United Nations an application for statehood, should be aware of the work of Palestinian Media Watch. The group, an Israeli research institute focused on monitoring the messages of all aspects of Palestinian media, has detailed some of the deception of the Palestinian Authority, even during moments of peace talks. For example, while portraying himself to the West as a man of compromise, Abbas said flatly last October that “we refuse to recognize a Jewish state.”

[snip]

Human rights groups, which could be highlighting the crimes of Arab dictatorships against Israel and each other, have instead chosen to focus primarily on Israel. They continually discount the extraordinary steps Israel takes to protect civilians on both sides — steps approved by military experts, such as using pamphlets, phone calls and even noise bombs to scare people away from a location before a bombing — while whitewashing Hamas’s desire to eliminate a whole country as just bluster and meaningless words. One would think that, of all organizations in the world, human rights groups would particularly believe that words matter. Words inform intent and influence action. Words and actions need to be taken seriously, especially when they are sponsored by governments.

In the article, Bernstein links to sources with a far-right pro-settler agenda and in particular, Itamar Marcus. Marcus has a long track record of misrepresenting the facts in order to support his anti-Palestinian agenda (see here and here).

First of all, Mahmoud Abbas and Palestinian PM Salaam Fayyad have repeatedly recognized Israel’s right not only to exist, but to do so in peace and security. Additionally, the Arab Peace Initiative stipulates that Arab League states would recognize and normalize relations with Israel upon a just resolution of the conflict- ie. a Palestinian state based on internationally recognized 1967 lines. The refusal to acknowledge Israel as a Jewish state is based on the PA’s oft-stated belief that doing so will hurt them in negotiations over the right of return and the rights of Arab citizens of Israel. Abbas specifically stated at the UN that he is not trying to delegitimize Israel but rather delegitimize the occupation. The media, the US government and the Israel Lobby continually ignore that very important distinction. I’m not sure why we should expect the Palestinians NOT to criticize and oppose their status as a stateless people under military occupation, but we clearly do.

That’s not to say there is no anti-Semitism in the Arab world- there is a lot of it. I am not going to defend irrational hatred of any kind. However, the ongoing occupation and failure to resolve the crisis only makes matters worse. The plight of the Palestinians is a festering wound in the Arab world and pretending that Israeli policies don’t play a role in how Israel is viewed is disingenuous. In addition, whether people agree or not, the perception of Israel is that it is exempted from all legal and moral accountability for everything and anything it does because of it’s relationship with the United States. So while the U.S. and our allies always claim Israel is being unfairly singled out for criticism at the UN (and there are times when it certainly has been), some would argue that it is also unfairly singled out for special protection and privileges. Two wrongs don’t make a right.

We all understand that Iran or Syria criticizing Israel’s human rights abuses is ridiculous, but does that automatically mean that the Palestinians can never have their rights under international law vindicated at the UN because sometimes Israel is unfairly targeted for criticism? The illegal settlement issue is a perfect example. Israel is allowed to knowingly violate international law with regard to settlements/land/water/resource appropriation for no other reason than that they are Israel and the Palestinians just have to suck it up. If the situation were reversed we certainly wouldn’t expect Israel to tolerate that- and they wouldn’t.

UPDATE: At least one media source has decided to analyze Bernstein’s claims, of course it’s not an American outlet but rather The Economist. You can check it out here.

Advertisements
, , , , , ,

About Stacy

Attorney, Publisher, Foreign Policy wonk

View all posts by Stacy

Subscribe

Subscribe to our RSS feed and social profiles to receive updates.

5 Comments on “Washington Post: Support for Palestinians at UN is Anti-Semitism *updated*”

  1. Steve Says:

    Jennifer Rubin has been tossing up posts about Israel and Obama’s declining support among US Jews. Today she has a commentary up about Obama being anti-Israel and the fact that he gives tons of weapons to Israel means NOTHING dammit!

    I am going to write the WaPo public editor and ask if they are going to hire a blogger who spends 85% of their time pushing a pro-Palestinian agenda. The WaPo says they hired Rubin because she’s a conservative but it’s clear they hired her for her Israel First views. She came from Commentary for Christ’s sake.

    Regarding Bernstein’s piece which you highlight- he’s conflating anti-Israel sentiment in the Arab world in general with the PA’s statehood bid and they are apples and oranges. The fact that some or even many in the Arab world don’t like Israel doesn’t mean the Palestinians don’t have a right to go to the UN. For him to claim that the UN is promoting anti-Semitism by allowing (and voting for?) the statehood bid is ridiculous. The UN is far from perfect but as you note the Israel Right or Wrong Crowd uses the UN for their political agenda just like some of the anti-Israel countries like Iran do.

    While some anti-Israel sentiment is based on anti-Semitism, it’s interesting that we all tend to take the view that at the time of Israel’s founding, it was perfectly acceptable for a state to be created on land that was already occupied by other people- no one asked the Palestinians if they would agree to the founding of Israel, nor was Israel the result of negotiations and yet we expect the Palestinians to negotiate for every little scrap and legal right. The fact that Israel’s founding was justified after the Holocaust doesn’t detract from the fact that it is rather unreasonable for us to expect that the Palestinians and others in the region would embrace the Israeli occupation.

    Reply

  2. Carolyn-Rodham Says:

    I had a holocaust survivor in my office today — stauch Israel-firster — who said, “The holocaust happened too long ago for people to keep feeling sorry for us. This generation doesn’t remember the holocaust. I don’t understand what Israel is doing anymore. Don’t they see how they are painting themselves into a corner?”
    That was the first glimmer of hope I’ve felt about
    the Israeli-Palestinian impasse in quite awhile.
    If American Jews start waking up, maybe, just maybe…

    Reply

    • Stacy Says:

      I don’t begrudge any Holocaust survivor their frustration and worry that current and future generations have forgotten the lessons of the Holocaust or their concern for Israel. The problem is that some in Israel and throughout the world are cynically using the Holocaust (and anti-Semitism) to justify terrible policies. That does nothing to promote remembering the Holocaust and actually cheapens it. I do worry that with continued occupation will come a rise in anti-Semitism, particularly if the perception is that the world’s Jewish diaspora community blindly supports any and all of Israel’s policies without question.

      I think there has been some change in the US Jewish community- younger Jews are debating the issues more openly and challenging some of the assumptions of the older generation. I think that’s part of the reason there is almost a hysterical push-back against any criticism of Israel that appears in the media. Even the fact that Tom Friedman wrote what he did several weeks ago is a positive sign of change.

      Reply

    • thainjacobs Says:

      Carolyn- you’re in the dog house as far as I’m concerned. What kind of gf are you anyway? You don’t call, you don’t write, you don’t blog hardly anymore. Not good. I’m looking for someone new.

      On the topic of Israel, I guess Time Magazine has an article this week about a Jewish family and their inter-generational disagreement about Israel. I’ll try to find it and drop the link here.

      My guess is it is up to the younger generation of Jewish people to start moving the Jewish community towards a less hawkish, pragmatic, pro human rights approach to Israel. The Occupation is getting harder and harder for reasonable people to defend and at a certain point it’s hard to claim to support human rights while supporting what is quickly becoming an apartheid system.

      Over at +972 and Mondoweiss they have been covering what the IDF does to Palestinian children to terrorize them in villages where there is a popular nonviolent resistance to the occupation. It’s the sort of thing you’d expect to see happening in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, not Israel. The fact that our media ignores it is telling. How can anyone, Jewish or not, support that kind of thing?

      Reply

  3. thainjacobs Says:

    Here it is, it’s good:

    http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2095505,00.html

    Maybe things are changing. Several years ago Time wouldn’t have even run this article.

    Reply

Leave a Response

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: