The Israeli PM’s Real Goal: Regime Change in Washington

It’s no secret Israeli PM Netanyahu is using his extensive reach and political power to help bolster the Republicans in an effort to ensure that Barack Obama is portrayed as an anti-Israel, terrorist-supporting waif. Never mind that Obama has done more for Israel on almost every front than any other President in history. Bibi has spent his entire Likud political career opposing the formation of an independent, contiguous Palestinian state and he knows that the GOP supports him in that cause. Sure, he said the words “two states” in 2009 but so what? He also bragged about using the Oslo Peace Process for the sole purpose of expanding Israel’s control over the territories via settlement expansion, all under the guise of Israel’s “security” needs. So long as Israel uses the word “security” in a sentence, the US simply drops on it’s knees and capitulates to whatever Israel wants. And naturally, the lily-livered Democrats have no intention of opposing Bibi’s attempt to unseat their President. No, in fact, they have, for their part, largely spent the last four years undermining their President’s foreign policy in order to prove they are the most pro-Likud leaders in Congress. Fabulous.

In light of all that, this article in Salon is interesting:

After being elected in large part because he’d opposed a “dumb” war in Iraq, President Obama finds himself confronting an even dumber one in Iran. Exponentially dumber, actually.

Dumb because like the targeted assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists rarely cited by columnist commandoes, bombing raids alone can’t achieve the alleged goal: preventing the Ayatollahs from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Slow them down, probably. Stop them, no. Short of a full-scale invasion and occupation of a nation three times larger than neighboring Iraq in population and five times larger in land area, that can’t be done. Global disapproval didn’t stop North Korea, Pakistan or, for that matter, Israel.

Exponentially dumb because it could set the entire Middle East aflame.

You’d think the Israelis, of all people, would recognize that threatening a people with death and destruction hardens their resolve. Yet the New York Times reports that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “told visitors that he believes the Tehran government to be deeply unpopular, indeed despised, and that a careful attack on its nuclear facilities might even be welcomed by Iranian citizens.”

Yes, and Dick Cheney predicted that U.S. forces invading Iraq would be greeted with candy and flowers. “Most analysts [in Jerusalem] and abroad,” the Times noted cautiously, “take a different view.” Indeed, historical examples of civilian populations cheering on aerial bombardments are rare, if not nonexistent. Despite his and Cheney’s obvious affinities, one would expect Netanyahu to be made of saner stuff.


But when articles invoking the Holocaust and urging “creative destruction” in Iran appear on the same day (Feb. 7) in the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Newsweek and Bloomberg News, a skeptical observer might be forgiven for suspecting a well-coordinated propaganda campaign.

Writing in Beirut-based Al-Akhbar, American journalist Max Blumenthal dates its inception to a Jan. 3 article in Israel Hayom revealing that Israel’s National Security Council — basically Netanyahu’s closest political allies — had concluded that “U.S. President Barack Obama is ‘naive’” and fails to understand Israel’s precarious position. Deemed a Likud Party organ, the newspaper is owned by multibillionaire Las Vegas casino tycoon Sheldon Adelson, who bankrolls Netanyahu and serves as Newt Gingrich’s Sugar Daddy too.

Netanyahu appears to see an Obama second term as an impediment to further Israeli expansion into the West Bank — or “Judea” and “Samaria,” as Likudniks style it — and has cast his lot with the Republican right. He’s made public appearances with notables like Glenn Beck and “End Times” evangelist John Hagee. Adelson himself has pledged his vast resources to Obama’s defeat.

In his State of the Union speech, President Obama reiterated his determination to prevent Iran’s getting nuclear weapons. He said he was “taking no options off the table.” But he also expressed hope that international sanctions could lead to a peaceful resolution.

On cue, Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen called this “startlingly naïve.” Only a fool or a Frenchman, the same pundit once opined, could doubt the existence of Saddam Hussein’s WMD. Bombs away!

Salon’s Glenn Greenwald has been diligently covering the issue and in particular, how the mainstream media have been cheer-leading for war with Iran by helpfully fear-mongering and spreading whatever baseless propaganda the U.S. and Israeli government want the uninformed electorate to have. That the media provides total anonymity to these government sources is truly incredible under the circumstances. That the march to war with Iran follows the exact same flawed, ginned-up, misleading path to war with Iraq, is also incredible.

Perhaps when people are asked if they support war with Iran they should also be asked “is war with Iran such a vital American interest that you believe that you or your children (18 or older) or other family members should be part of a draft?” Because we all know that Americans (not in the military) support wars against Muslim Brown People in far away places with the explicit understanding that absolutely no sacrifice will ever be asked of them.

About Stacy

Attorney, Publisher, Foreign Policy wonk

View all posts by Stacy


Subscribe to our RSS feed and social profiles to receive updates.

4 Comments on “The Israeli PM’s Real Goal: Regime Change in Washington”

  1. Carolyn-Rodham Says:

    Did you see Niall Ferguson’s opinion piece in Newsweek?

    Israel and Iran on the Eve of Destruction in a New Six-Day War

    My favorite part? His coining the term “creative destruction.”


    • thainjacobs Says:

      Ferguson is an asshat. The guy was wrong, wrong, wrong about everything leading up to Iraq but now all the MSM and neocons are quoting him for his brilliance on Iran? The guy is a one-stop shop for baseless propaganda.

      What is it with all these Brits who urge the US to start wars everywhere?

      What’s incredible is these people never get called on their bullshit. How about someone ask him “since you made the exact same argument for Iraq, what makes you think you are right now?”

      Why is it assumed that every single problem Israel has is automatically our responsibility. No offense, but maybe when people flocked to colonize a country in a really bad neighborhood where there were already, you know, PEOPLE living there, they should now take responsibility for the consequences of that?

      Iran has the largest Jewish population second only to Israel (in the Middle East)- is Iran trying to “wipe” their Jewish population “off the map?” No, they aren’t. Hmmmm….

      Whenever Ahmadinejad talks shit about Israel does anyone notice he doesn’t use the word “Jewish” or “Jews” but rather usually the political term “Zionists?” Some may think this is a minor distinction but it’s not. A lot of people in the region are sick of the Zionist colonial enterprise but have no interest in wiping out Jews. Many Christian Evangelicals identify as “Zionist.” I am firmly in the anti-Zionist camp just like I am in the anti-Religious Right camp. I don’t hate Jews and I don’t hate Christians I just don’t like the extremists on either side (including Muslim extremists) who hide behind religion in order to promote a political agenda that oppresses others (and that includes the Catholic Church!)


      • Carolyn-Rodham Says:

        Hey boy friend, nice to see you posting here again! Maybe you (and/or stacy) can clear something up for me: since Israel has enough arms to flatten Iran all by itself, how did the expectation evolve between our two countries that we would do their dirty work for them? That’s not a rhetorical question. How would Netanyahu defend that? I’ve never understood Israel’s chutzpah in entertaining that assumption, but I’ve been puzzled why the lemmings in our own government — the SOS among them, sad to say — seem to accept without question their duty to throw themselves over that particular cliff, taking us with them.


        • thainjacobs Says:

          Hey there!

          Because we are Israel’s rent boy (that’s the less offensive way of saying we are their bitch). Seriously, it’s apparently been handed down on some stone tablet or something. Whenever Israel has a problem they should not lift a finger but rather the US should do it.

          Because Israel likes to say that the very existence of the Jewish People is at stake, the logic goes that Israel shouldn’t have to waste all it’s rockets and missiles on the New Hitlers in Iran because then when the Other New Hitlers rise up in the next Muslim nation we want to bomb, they won’t have enough missiles! If the US does the heavy lifting then the US taxpayer just buys more missiles! This way, Israel maintains the largest and most powerful military in the Middle East (and the only nuclear power there) while also being able to afford socialized, government-sponsored healthcare while here in the US we are told we can’t afford it and also that it’s evil because, you know, it’s socialism!

          It’s sad when the only news source pointing out the obvious about Iran is the Onion:


          Glenn Greenwald is one of only a few people trying to point out the hypocrisy and propaganda of Israel, the US and the MSM:


Leave a Response

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: